Allow building simple Websites on top of Decentraland Names
Jason Mert
This DAO proposal has passed on all 3 stages including the final 3rd stage Governance by majority of the community votes yet there has not been any development at all & HPrivakos is telling people in the Discord that this proposal can not be enacted?
See official DAO link below;
Can somebody please explain why it can't be implemented? because according to DAO guidelines a Governance proposal is accepted if it meets the acceptance threshold of 6M VP and the Yes option gets a simple majority.
Are we changing the rules as we go? How is DAO or Decentraland, community driven and or created by the community when a simple passed DAO proposal doesn't get implemented or enacted?
Those who are part of the Foundation team & DAO team can hate me all they want but all I ever wanted was the best for Decentraland.
I wasn't asking for funding in this proposal so I could do a runner like most who received large sums of grants but didn't end up building anything nor contributing to the platform at all by any means.
BAYC are coming up with their cross naming system for .ape all others are building revolutionary naming systems trying to capitalise within this sector trying merge Web2 with Web3 and having utility & use-cases that's never been seen before. I believed DCL Names have a great opportunity because of where they stand & this implementation would have brought in much needed Web2 users into Decentraland.
A platform with less than 50 active users a day shouldn't be afraid of changes, in fact they should be the leading pioneers in every aspect. Being afraid holds us back while giving opportunities to our competitors to excel, where we fail.
Jason Mert
By the way, there has been two prior proposals before this and both have passed by the community votes. Which goes to show, Decentraland Community really wants this implementation. They want it to be enacted, implemented and come to fruition. Reflected by their consent in voting "Yes"
I would not have pursued this proposal any further if in the beginning Stage 1, Poll Proposal had not passed. However in this scenario that was not the case. Which gave me motivation to pursue it further all the way to Stage 3 Governance Proposal.
There are certain individuals who dictate what goes through and what doesn't & until or unless we get rid of them, Decentraland will never flourish or gain mass adoption.
HPrivakos admitted on Decentraland Discord that this transaction can not be enacted because it wasn't recorded on-chain therefore it wasn't a binding proposal. Another big fat lie because all Snapshot records for Governance Proposals are all recorded on-chain. Making them valid & irreversible. Including, timestamp, wallet addresses, VP, date, Voting Power, amount of votes etc.. Another false accusation and providing users with false date, which leads them to confusion and wrong information.
I am certain we all know who they are.
For those who want to learn the truth read the DAO userguide linked below
https://docs.decentraland.org/player/general/dao/dao-userguide/